hard · Enhanced ACT reading
A conservator responsible for a seventeenth-century altarpiece once turned down a client's request to erase a long crack that ran through the painted sky above the central figure. She explained that the crack, caused by decades in a damp sacristy, had become part of what the painting now was: to fill it seamlessly would produce a physical object that looked older than the varnish suggested but felt, paradoxically, less honest about its own age. Her job, she said, was not to return the painting to a moment that could never really be recovered, but to keep visible the entire life the object had lived since it left the artist's hand—including the years that had not been kind to it.
The conservator's remarks suggest that she views the erasure of the crack as:
- a technically impossible repair given the extent of damage the sacristy's dampness caused over decades.
- a repair that would falsify the painting's real history rather than merely fix its surface, she felt.
- a request she is willing to reconsider once the client understands the added cost involved fully.
- an aesthetic improvement that unfortunately conflicts with standard conservation guidelines today.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More Enhanced ACT reading practice
- What is the main idea of the paragraph?
- Which of the following is the central point of the paragraph?
- Which choice best summarizes the main idea of the passage?
- What date was written on the map ?
- what time did Elias check his watch?
- The passage indicates that the economist responds to her critics primarily by:
- The passage most strongly suggests that the keeper's true motivation for his long service
- The author includes the examples of opening jars and carrying coconut shells primarily in