easy · Act science

A physicist hypothesizes that the period of a pendulum is determined solely by the length of the string and is independent of the bob's mass. Mass (g) | Length (cm) | Period (s) 50 | 100 | 2.0 100 | 100 | 2.0 150 | 100 | 2.0 Which conclusion is best supported by these experimental results?

  1. The hypothesis is refuted because a constant period indicates that the pendulum is not functioning properly.
  2. The hypothesis is supported because the period remains constant across all trials despite changes in mass.
  3. The hypothesis is refuted because the experiment did not vary the length of the string to prove its influence.
  4. The hypothesis is supported because a mass of 150 g resulted in a stable period for the pendulum system.

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →

More Act science practice

KomFi Academy — Stop doomscrolling. Get KomFi.

Build your intelligence, anytime, anywhere.

KomFi Academy is a curated training platform with 48,000+ practice questions, 20,000+ flashcards, on-demand video lectures, podcasts, and 4K slide decks across the topics serious professionals study: GMAT, LSAT, MCAT, Investment Banking, Private Equity (LBOs & PE math), Private Credit, Quantitative Finance, Financial Accounting, Asset- Backed Securities, Volume Profile Analysis, Order Flow Trading, Market Microstructure, Volume Spread Analysis, Elliott Wave Theory, Volume-Price Analysis, and Public Offering Frameworks.

What's inside

Topics

View pricing · Read testimonials