hard · Corporate Credit Analysis cca-core
An analyst is reconciling why a company with strong reported net income of $180M and reported leverage of 3.0x is nonetheless burning cash. Notes reveal: (a) days sales outstanding rose from 45 to 75 days on flat revenue of $1,200M; (b) the firm factored $100M of receivables with recourse near year-end, recording it as a sale that reduced reported debt; (c) capitalized interest of $40M was excluded from interest expense; (d) it switched from accelerated to straight-line depreciation, raising net income.
Which single adjustment most materially distorts the reported 3.0x leverage and should be reversed first?
- Reversing the $40M of capitalized interest, since excluding it from expense understates the true interest burden used in coverage ratios
- Adding back the $100M of recourse factoring to debt, since the recourse retains the credit risk and the 'sale' is economically secured borrowing
- Reversing the switch to straight-line depreciation, since that accounting change inflates net income and therefore understates apparent leverage
- Capitalizing the receivables growth caused by the rising DSO as a non-cash working-capital drag that analysts should add directly back to reported debt
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More Corporate Credit Analysis cca-core practice
- Which statement best reflects the credit risk synthesis?
- Using the Merton structural model intuition, if a company's equity volatility (sigma_V) in
- What is its CET1 ratio?
- Andean Iron Corp is a low-cost iron ore producer. In a globa… — What does this imply for i
- What is the Net External Debt?
- Riverbed Logistics reports $4,200M in revenue. However, a si… — How does this impact the c
- According to the Merton framework, what is the most likely outcome for a creditor holding
- If the debt-to-GDP ratio was 80% last year, what is the projected debt-to-GDP ratio for th