medium · Elliott Wave Theory alternation

Consider a diagonal (ending diagonal) versus a standard impulse, both being channeled. An analyst claims that 'throw-over' and 'channel convergence' carry opposite diagnostic meaning in the two structures.

Which statement most accurately captures the correct distinction?

  1. In an ending diagonal the channel lines CONVERGE and a throw-over of the upper line is a normal terminal feature, whereas in an impulse the lines are roughly PARALLEL and a throw-over signals exhaustion of an extended fifth
  2. In an ending diagonal the channel lines converge and a throw-over of the upper line actually invalidates the diagonal count, whereas in an impulse a throw-over instead confirms a healthy continuation of the trend.
  3. In both structures the channel lines converge toward a common apex as the pattern matures, but only in the standard impulse does a throw-over above the upper boundary mark the true terminal point of the entire five-wave move.
  4. In an ending diagonal the boundary lines are roughly parallel to one another and a throw-under of the lower line is required for completion, whereas in an impulse the boundary lines instead converge steadily toward the peak of wave 5.

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →

More Elliott Wave Theory alternation practice

KomFi Academy — Stop doomscrolling. Get KomFi.

Turn wasted screen time into verifiable competence.

KomFi Academy is a curated training platform with 75,000+ practice questions, 26,500+ flashcards, on-demand video lectures, podcasts, and 4K slide decks across the topics serious professionals study: GMAT, LSAT, MCAT, SAT, Investment Banking, Private Equity (LBOs & PE math), Private Credit, Quantitative Finance, Financial Accounting, Asset- Backed Securities, Volume Profile Analysis, Order Flow Trading, Market Microstructure, Volume Spread Analysis, Elliott Wave Theory, Volume-Price Analysis, and Public Offering Frameworks.

What's inside

Topics

View pricing · Read testimonials