medium · Elliott Wave Theory alternation
An analyst is comparing two corrective counts. Count A shows a Wave 4 that has lasted 22 days, while the Wave 2 lasted only 3 days.
Why might the analyst question this count?
- Wave 4 must always be shorter than Wave 2 in duration.
- The swing count of the impulse would be uneven.
- The duration ratio exceeds the 2.618 proportionality guideline.
- Duration has no impact on wave validity as long as prices don't overlap.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More Elliott Wave Theory alternation practice
- According to the 'Fourth-Wave Target Zone' guideline, where is a correction most likely to
- According to the Guideline of Alternation, what should you expect for Wave 4?
- A correction targets the price zone of the 'prior fourth wav… — What does this mean in pra
- You see a rally with two identical corrections. Both were zi… — Why might you doubt this i
- Where is the most likely target for the major Wave 4 correction?
- What is the most likely target for the subsequent Wave 4?
- If the analyst wants to project the end of the entire impulse using the 'Equality Guidelin
- According to the 'Guideline of Depth', which area is the most likely target for the bottom