medium · Elliott Wave Theory corrective
In a regular flat correction (3-3-5), wave B retraces to 138% of wave A and wave C terminates at 261.8% of wave A's length (measured from B's end).
Under the Elliott Wave guidelines, which single label is BEST justified for this entire structure, and on what defining sub-wave relationship does that classification primarily rest?
- A running flat, because wave C fails to travel beyond A's origin, despite B exceeding A's start, leaving net progress still in the trend direction
- An expanded (irregular) flat, because wave B exceeds the start of wave A and wave C exceeds the end of wave A, with C extending well past B's terminal level
- A regular flat, because both B and C return to roughly the same level as the preceding wave's origin, keeping all three legs of the pattern near-equal
- A zigzag, because a C that reaches 261.8% of A confirms a dominant five-wave C overpowering a sharp A, which makes the net move impulsive rather than corrective
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More Elliott Wave Theory corrective practice
- An analyst sees a coiling sideways pattern with five legs (A… — What mistake has been made
- Scenario: Wave A of a correction has $5 clear sub-waves. What can the analyst immediately
- If a correction consists of five overlapping legs (A, B, C, D, E), where every single leg
- In a powerful uptrend, a correction occurs where wave B exceeds the start of wave A, but w
- Which corrective pattern is known for being a 'sharp' correction and is most commonly foun
- During an expanding triangle, which of the following is true regarding the size of the wav
- A correction in a bear market rallies in 3 waves to a level… — Which pattern does this rep
- An analyst sees a 3-wave decline followed by a 3-wave rally that retraces 95% of the decli