hard · Elliott Wave Theory
A triangle labeled as Wave 4 occurs. Wave 2 of the same impulse was a brief 23.6% retracement flat.
According to the Guideline of Alternation, what is most likely to be true about the triangle?
- The triangle is invalid because Wave 2 was a flat
- The triangle will be a simple zigzag instead
- The triangle will also be a 23.6% retracement
- The triangle will be more time-consuming and complex than Wave 2
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More Elliott Wave Theory practice
- In a five-wave advance, Wave 1 is 10 points long, Wave 3 is… — How should this count be co
- A commodity price moves from $80 to $96, pullbacks to $88, t… — If an analyst identifies t
- Which is more likely?
- According to the Swing Count Validation technique, what should the trader conclude?
- Based on common Fibonacci relationships, how far might Wave C drop from the end of Wave B?
- An analyst sees a 'Close-Below-Prior-Swing Test' fire when p… — What does this likely sign
- According to the 'Fourth-Wave Target Zone' guideline, where is a correction most likely to
- According to the Guideline of Alternation, what should you expect for Wave 4?