medium · Elliott Wave Theory
In the context of expanded flats, why is the Wave C target often calculated as 1.618 × Wave A instead of 1.618 × Wave B?
- The rule only applies to expanded flats in commodities
- Wave B is too volatile to provide a reliable projection base
- Wave A establishes the initial degree and price scale of the correction
- Wave B must always be shorter than Wave A
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More Elliott Wave Theory practice
- In a five-wave advance, Wave 1 is 10 points long, Wave 3 is… — How should this count be co
- A commodity price moves from $80 to $96, pullbacks to $88, t… — If an analyst identifies t
- Which is more likely?
- According to the Swing Count Validation technique, what should the trader conclude?
- Based on common Fibonacci relationships, how far might Wave C drop from the end of Wave B?
- An analyst sees a 'Close-Below-Prior-Swing Test' fire when p… — What does this likely sign
- According to the 'Fourth-Wave Target Zone' guideline, where is a correction most likely to
- According to the Guideline of Alternation, what should you expect for Wave 4?