hard · Elliott Wave Theory
Consider a diagonal (ending diagonal) versus a standard impulse, both being channeled. An analyst claims that 'throw-over' and 'channel convergence' carry opposite diagnostic meaning in the two structures.
Which statement most accurately captures the correct distinction?
- In an ending diagonal the channel lines CONVERGE and a throw-over of the upper line is a normal terminal feature, whereas in an impulse the lines are roughly PARALLEL and a throw-over signals exhaustion of an extended fifth
- In an ending diagonal the lines converge and a throw-over invalidates the diagonal, whereas in an impulse a throw-over confirms a healthy continuation
- In both structures the channel lines converge, but only in the impulse does a throw-over mark the terminal point of the move
- In an ending diagonal the lines are parallel and a throw-under is required, whereas in an impulse the lines converge toward wave 5
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More Elliott Wave Theory practice
- In a five-wave advance, Wave 1 is 10 points long, Wave 3 is… — How should this count be co
- A commodity price moves from $80 to $96, pullbacks to $88, t… — If an analyst identifies t
- Which is more likely?
- According to the Swing Count Validation technique, what should the trader conclude?
- Based on common Fibonacci relationships, how far might Wave C drop from the end of Wave B?
- An analyst sees a 'Close-Below-Prior-Swing Test' fire when p… — What does this likely sign
- According to the 'Fourth-Wave Target Zone' guideline, where is a correction most likely to
- According to the Guideline of Alternation, what should you expect for Wave 4?