medium · FRM Part 2 Liquidity & Treasury Risk
A bank calculates its NSFR and identifies $120 billion in Available Stable Funding (ASF) and $110 billion in Required Stable Funding (RSF).
How would a new $10 billion long-term mortgage (RSF factor 85%) funded by $10 billion in new core deposits (ASF factor 95%) affect the ratio?
- The NSFR will remain unchanged, as both sides rise by equal amounts.
- The NSFR will decrease because the new RSF requirement outweighs the new ASF contribution.
- The NSFR will increase to exactly 118%, driven by the mortgage's RSF factor.
- The NSFR will increase because the new funding's ASF exceeds the new asset's RSF.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More FRM Part 2 Liquidity & Treasury Risk practice
- What is the bank's Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR), and does it meet the minimum Basel III
- To immunize the economic value of equity against a parallel rate shift, what is the requir
- A bank's Economic Value of Equity (EVE) is exposed to interest rate risk. Assets are $1,00
- Which lens of Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book (IRRBB) would show a significant loss
- A bank has 100 bn of securities classified as 'Held-to-Matur… — If interest rates rise and
- A bank's balance sheet shows total assets of 100 bn with a modified duration of DA = 5.0an
- Under the current regulatory framework, what is the specific time horizon defined for the
- What does 'Pre-positioned' collateral mean in the context of a central bank facility in th