medium · FRM Part 2 Operational Risk
A bank's Risk and Control Self-Assessment (RCSA) identifies a 'High' inherent risk for a vendor process, but the 'Residual' risk is marked 'Low' based on a 90% control effectiveness score. If the bank has never audited the vendor's actual performance, the RCSA is likely suffering from:
- A violation of the subadditivity property of coherent risk measures like ES.
- A 'Type 1' error appearing in the Kupiec proportion-of-failures backtest.
- Self-assessment optimism bias and a failure of 'operating effectiveness' testing.
- Model drift in the 'Population Stability Index' (PSI) used for monitoring ML models.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More FRM Part 2 Operational Risk practice
- Which of the following describes the 'One Big Loss' principle for heavy-tailed (subexponen
- In the Bow-Tie analysis framework, where do 'Preventive Controls' sit relative to the oper
- A customer consistently deposits $9,800 in cash at three dif… — This behavior is a classic
- The Standardized Measurement Approach (SMA) formula is composed of two primary factors: th
- What is the regulatory treatment for 'Boundary Events' regarding capital requirements unde
- In the Standardized Measurement Approach (SMA), the Business Indicator (BI) serves as a pr
- Under a proper governance framework, 'Model Limitations' must be:
- If the bank had a poor loss history (LC > BIC), what is the impact on its capital?