medium · FRM Part 2 Operational Risk

What is the fundamental governance error in this argument?

1. It ignores the diversification benefit that occurs when losses are spread across multiple business lines, making the single-desk loss largely immaterial to the firm as a whole.
2. It confuses Appetite with Capacity, since under this flawed logic Appetite must always equal the firm's total equity capital minus its applicable regulatory capital requirements, which is incorrect.
3. It violates the three lines of defense principle, because only the Board of Directors is formally authorized to adjust risk metrics after a loss event has already occurred and been reviewed.
4. It suffers from 'outcome bias,' where a survivable loss is wrongly used to justify a higher ex-ante risk tolerance, ignoring that the same risk could have produced a catastrophic result.

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →