hard · FRM Part 2 Operational Risk
A firm aggregates operational risk capital across two units of measure, each with a 99.9% standalone VaR of $100 million. Risk managers debate the diversification benefit. One argues that because operational losses are heavy-tailed, combining the two units must produce a diversification benefit (sub-additivity) at the 99.9% level, just as for normal risks.
Which statement is correct regarding the additivity of these VaRs?
- VaR is always sub-additive for independent risks, so the combined 99.9% VaR is strictly below $200 million regardless of tail heaviness.
- For sufficiently heavy-tailed independent losses with tail index below 1 (infinite mean), VaR can be super-additive, so the combined 99.9% VaR may exceed $200 million; summing standalone VaRs is not guaranteed to be conservative.
- Because the units are different, perfect-dependence summation always applies and the combined VaR equals exactly $200 million by regulatory convention.
- Sub-additivity of VaR holds for any elliptically-distributed risks, and since operational losses are a sum of many small effects they are asymptotically elliptical, guaranteeing a diversification benefit.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More FRM Part 2 Operational Risk practice
- Which of the following describes the 'One Big Loss' principle for heavy-tailed (subexponen
- Under the current Basel Standardized Measurement Approach (SMA) for operational risk, whic
- Which of the following is NOT one of them?
- What is the marginal coefficient for the portion of the BI that exceeds 30 billion euros?
- According to standard regulatory definitions (such as SR 11-7), which three components are
- A material change to a model is most likely to be triggered by which event?
- How long is the historical window required for calculating the average annual operational
- In the Bow-Tie analysis framework, where do 'Preventive Controls' sit relative to the oper