medium · Frm Part 2 Operational Risk
A business unit identifies 50 risks in its RCSA, all with 'Residual Scores' of 1 or 2 (Green). The total 'Expected Loss' (EL) for the unit is $5m.
Why might a CRO still be concerned about the 'Aggregate' risk of this unit?
- The SMA capital formula will double the capital for this unit regardless of the RCSA scores.
- A $5m EL is too high for a unit with only 'Green' residual risks.
- The unit is clearly 'Under-reporting' its inherent risk to keep the residual scores green.
- RCSA often misses 'Interdependencies'; 50 small independent risks may be highly correlated in a systemic stress event.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More Frm Part 2 Operational Risk practice
- Which of the following describes the 'One Big Loss' principle for heavy-tailed (subexponen
- Under the current Basel Standardized Measurement Approach (SMA) for operational risk, whic
- Which of the following is NOT one of them?
- What is the marginal coefficient for the portion of the BI that exceeds 30 billion euros?
- According to standard regulatory definitions (such as SR 11-7), which three components are
- A material change to a model is most likely to be triggered by which event?
- How long is the historical window required for calculating the average annual operational
- In the Bow-Tie analysis framework, where do 'Preventive Controls' sit relative to the oper