medium · Frm Part 2 Risk & Investment Management
A Chief Risk Officer observes that a specific hedging strategy using out-of-the-money puts shows a negative Marginal VaR.
What is the primary management implication of this negative sign?
- Increasing the size of the position will decrease the total portfolio VaR.
- The position carries zero stand-alone risk and is essentially 'free' to hold.
- The asset's correlation with the portfolio is exactly zero.
- The desk is over-hedged and should reduce the position to reach a zero VaR state.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More Frm Part 2 Risk & Investment Management practice
- A hedge fund strategy captures frequent small gains but suff… — This risk profile is most
- A risk manager is evaluating an 'Illiquid Asset' (e.g., Priv… — Why is the 'Autocorrelatio
- An active manager has an Information Coefficient (IC) of 0.06 and a breadth (BR) of 400 in
- If the reported volatility is 10% and the first-order autocorrelation (φ) of returns is 0.
- In the context of Liquidity Risk, the 'Denominator Effect' refers to which of the followin
- If the manager effectively doubles the breadth (BR) of the strategy while maintaining the
- According to factor theory, why does an asset that pays off during 'bad times' (such as a
- If a position is removed from a portfolio, the change in total VaR is exactly equal to its