hard · Investment Banking ma-lbo

Two sponsors model the same LBO. Sponsor A assumes the target's existing debt is repaid at close and refinanced into the new capital structure (a change-of-control redemption); Sponsor B assumes the existing notes — trading at 92 cents on the dollar and bearing a below-market 3% coupon — are ASSUMED and left outstanding. Both use identical operating assumptions, the same total leverage, and the same exit.

Why might Sponsor B's model show a higher equity IRR despite identical leverage?

  1. The assumed notes carry a below-market coupon, so lower cash interest preserves more FCF for incremental debt paydown over the hold, lifting the equity return
  2. Assuming the notes avoids the call premium and tender costs of redemption, which lowers the equity check at close and mechanically raises IRR even with identical interest expense
  3. The notes trade at 92, so assuming them lets Sponsor B mark them to market and book the 8-point discount as immediate equity value at close
  4. Leaving the notes outstanding reduces the new-money debt raised, lowering total interest expense and freeing cash flow for sweep

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →

More Investment Banking ma-lbo practice

KomFi: Test Prep Made Easy

KomFi: Test Prep Made Easy — free adaptive practice for GMAT, GRE, SAT, ACT, National Real Estate Exam, Investment Banking, and finance with full explanations.

KomFi Academy is free GMAT prep and personalized GMAT help built as a training platform: 92,240+ practice questions, 30,500+ flashcards, on-demand video lectures, podcasts, and 4K slide decks. Flagship tracks: Free GMAT Prep, Free GMAT Resources, National Real Estate Exam Prep, Investment Banking Prep, Finance Prep, GRE, SAT, ACT, LSAT, MCAT, Financial Accounting, Private Equity, Private Credit, and Quantitative Finance.

Free GMAT Prep & Personalized GMAT Help

What's inside

Topics

View pricing · Read testimonials