medium · Investment Banking valuation-core

An analyst is valuing a bank using an Enterprise Value to EBITDA multiple.

Why is this methodology likely to produce a flawed result?

  1. For banks, interest is an operating expense and debt is an operating liability, making EV and EBITDA inconsistent
  2. Banks are always valued exclusively using a Dividend Discount Model rather than EBITDA-based multiples.
  3. Banks generally do not report meaningful Depreciation or Amortization, so EBITDA effectively equals EBIT for most banks.
  4. EBITDA is artificially too high for banks specifically because of their inherently very high degree of financial leverage.

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →

More Investment Banking valuation-core practice

KomFi: Test Prep Made Easy

KomFi: Test Prep Made Easy — free adaptive practice for GMAT, GRE, SAT, ACT, National Real Estate Exam, Investment Banking, and finance with full explanations.

KomFi Academy is free GMAT prep and personalized GMAT help built as a training platform: 92,240+ practice questions, 30,500+ flashcards, on-demand video lectures, podcasts, and 4K slide decks. Flagship tracks: Free GMAT Prep, Free GMAT Resources, National Real Estate Exam Prep, Investment Banking Prep, Finance Prep, GRE, SAT, ACT, LSAT, MCAT, Financial Accounting, Private Equity, Private Credit, and Quantitative Finance.

Free GMAT Prep & Personalized GMAT Help

What's inside

Topics

View pricing · Read testimonials