hard · LSAT
In a research-team selection game, two conditional rules apply. Rule 4: if Levy is not selected, then Henderson is selected (neg L to H). Rule 1: if Henderson is selected, then Jacobs is not selected (H to neg J).
Combining Rule 4 and Rule 1, which one of the following is a valid deduction?
- Levy and Jacobs cannot both be selected.
- If Jacobs is selected, then Levy is selected.
- Jacobs and Henderson can both be selected.
- If Levy is selected, then Jacobs cannot be selected.
- If Henderson is not selected, then Jacobs is selected.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- The author's use of the word "demonstrates" most strongly suggests that the author's attit
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the statements above?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?