hard · LSAT
For decades, the standard model of particle physics held that neutrinos—tiny, nearly massless particles produced in nuclear reactions—had no mass at all. However, this model was challenged by the 'solar neutrino problem': detectors on Earth were recording only a fraction of the neutrinos predicted to be coming from the sun. The solution came with the discovery of neutrino oscillations. Neutrinos exist in three types, or 'flavors.' As they travel through space, they can spontaneously transform from one flavor into another. Because the early detectors were only sensitive to one flavor, they were missing the neutrinos that had switched during their journey. For this oscillation to occur, quantum mechanics requires that neutrinos must possess a non-zero mass. This discovery forced a significant revision of the standard model and opened new questions about the nature of dark matter, as neutrinos' mass, though tiny, could have significant gravitational effects across the universe.
Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the explanation that neutrino oscillation is the cause of the solar neutrino problem?
- Detectors built to register all three flavors at once still tally far fewer neutrinos than the sun is predicted to emit.
- Neutrinos from non-solar sources, such as nuclear reactors, also display flavor oscillation.
- Updated solar models conclude the sun emits fewer neutrinos than once thought, matching the early single-flavor counts.
- The neutrino's mass turns out to be even smaller than current lower-bound estimates.
- Neutrino oscillation has been shown to be physically impossible under any version of quantum mechanics.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- The author's use of the word "demonstrates" most strongly suggests that the author's attit
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the statements above?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?