medium · LSAT Reading Comprehension

The study of standardized brick sizes and grid-patterned streets in the Indus Valley suggests a high degree of centralized political authority as early as 2600 BCE. Such uniformity across vast distances implies a coordinated effort to regulate construction and urban life, even in the absence of monumental palaces or royal tombs. Critics of this view argue that communal consensus among merchant guilds could explain the standardization without the need for a singular ruling elite. However, the sheer scale of the drainage systems and the consistency of weight systems used in trade suggest a level of oversight that typically requires a formal administrative structure. This debate highlights the difficulty of inferring social hierarchy from purely material remains.

A historian finds that two separate ancient cities, hundreds of miles apart, used identical clay tokens to record grain debts. Based on the passage, how would a proponent of the centralized authority theory interpret this finding?

As a signature of a formal administrative apparatus coordinating commerce across the region.
As a voluntary accord reached by merchant guilds operating free of any governing power.
As an indication that these cities possessed no political elite or social ranking at all.
As mere happenstance traceable to a scarcity of clay in the ancient world.
As conclusive, irrefutable proof that a single all-powerful monarch ruled both cities.

A historian finds that two separate ancient cities, hundreds of miles apart, used identical clay tokens to record grain debts. Based on the passage, how would a proponent of the centralized authority theory interpret this finding?

More LSAT Reading Comprehension practice

KomFi Academy — Stop doomscrolling. Get KomFi.

What's inside

Topics