medium · LSAT Reading Comprehension
A passage on neurobiology recounts that for most of the twentieth century scientists believed the adult brain was fixed and incapable of forming new neurons. A principal source of this belief, the passage notes, was clinical experience with brain injury: damage to an adult brain usually produced permanent loss of function, in sharp contrast to the more complete recovery frequently seen when children suffered comparable injuries.
According to the passage, which one of the following best explains why twentieth-century scientists believed the adult brain was fixed?
- Clinical experience indicated that injuries to the adult brain ordinarily led to permanent loss of function.
- Early studies conducted on rodents were mistakenly assumed to apply directly to human subjects.
- The hippocampus was believed to be the one region of the brain capable of regeneration.
- Scientists had not yet developed the staining techniques needed to detect newly formed neurons.
- Adult patients were observed to recover from brain injuries even more fully than young children did.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Reading Comprehension practice
- The author's use of the word "demonstrates" most strongly suggests that the author's attit
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the primary purpose of the second par
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the author's attitude toward the pres
- Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the passage?
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the author's attitude toward true cri
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the primary function of the second pa
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the author's attitude toward urban mi
- Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the passage?