medium · LSAT Reading Comprehension
The Law passage acknowledges that legislatures can pass new statutes that supersede a court's interpretation of the law, so that flawed precedents are not beyond correction in principle. It stresses, however, that enacting such a statute requires marshaling political support, and that a population harmed by a flawed precedent may be politically marginalized and therefore unable to influence legislators effectively.
According to the passage, which one of the following is a practical barrier to legislative correction of a flawed judicial precedent?
- Legislatures are constitutionally forbidden from altering laws that originate in court decisions.
- Statutes are invariably vaguer than court rulings and therefore sow more confusion.
- Judges are free to disregard new statutes whenever those statutes clash with established precedent.
- The people harmed by the flawed precedent may lack the political influence needed to sway legislators.
- Drafting a corrective statute typically takes far longer than overruling the precedent in court.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Reading Comprehension practice
- The author's use of the word "demonstrates" most strongly suggests that the author's attit
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the primary purpose of the second par
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the author's attitude toward the pres
- Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the passage?
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the author's attitude toward true cri
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the primary function of the second pa
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the author's attitude toward urban mi
- Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the passage?