Judicial independence is the principle that the judiciary should be kept separate from the other branches of government and shielded from political pressure. This independence is essential for ensuring that judges can make decisions based solely on the law and the facts of a case, without fear of retaliation from the executive or legislative branches. In a healthy democracy, the courts must be seen as impartial arbiters of justice rather than political actors. This is why many systems provide judges with lifetime appointments or long terms of office. However, judicial independence should not be confused with judicial unaccountability. Judges are still bound by the law and are subject to ethical oversight and, in extreme cases, removal for misconduct. Some critics argue that an independent judiciary can become an 'antidemocratic' force, as unelected judges can strike down laws passed by the people's representatives. While it is true that this power must be exercised with restraint, it is a necessary part of the 'checks and balances' system that prevents a 'tyranny of the majority.' Judicial independence is a fragile but vital institution that requires constant protection from those who would use the courts for partisan gain.