easy · LSAT Reading Comprehension
Some urban planners have advocated for mixed-use development, in which residences and commercial spaces occupy the same neighborhoods. Proponents argue that mixed-use development reduces commuting and encourages walking, while critics note that it can create noise conflicts between residents and businesses.
Which one of the following can most reasonably be inferred about the proponents of mixed-use development?
- They regard cutting down commuting and promoting walking as benefits worth pursuing in urban areas.
- They consider walkability to be the single most important determinant of a city's overall health.
- They were the first group of planners to question the prevailing model of single-use zoning.
- They are unaware of the noise conflicts that critics associate with mixed-use development.
- They believe mixed-use development carries no disadvantages of any significant kind.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Reading Comprehension practice
- The author's use of the word "demonstrates" most strongly suggests that the author's attit
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the primary purpose of the second par
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the author's attitude toward the pres
- Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the passage?
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the author's attitude toward true cri
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the primary function of the second pa
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the author's attitude toward urban mi
- Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the passage?