medium · LSAT Reading Comprehension
Historians have traditionally viewed the changes to marriage contracts in 18th-century England as a sign of progress for women. The legal scholar Staves, however, challenges this interpretation, arguing that the underlying legal protections remained far weaker than the contracts' language of equality implied.
Which one of the following inferences about the notion of 'progress for women' is most consistent with the passage?
- The traditional view held that the 18th-century contractual changes meaningfully advanced women's legal and financial standing.
- Staves measures progress exclusively by a wife's ability to own and dispose of commercial assets.
- The traditional view rested on the belief that wives gained the right to sell land they inherited.
- Staves maintains that genuine progress is attainable only by abolishing marriage as a legal institution.
- Historians and Staves agree that no progress for women occurred during the 18th century.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Reading Comprehension practice
- The author's use of the word "demonstrates" most strongly suggests that the author's attit
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the primary purpose of the second par
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the author's attitude toward the pres
- Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the passage?
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the author's attitude toward true cri
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the primary function of the second pa
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the author's attitude toward urban mi
- Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the passage?