medium · Market Microstructure

A continuous limit-order book has a constant arrival of liquidity but is subject to an inventory-averse market maker who quotes around her reservation price rather than the efficient mid.

Under the Avellaneda-Stoikov framework, as the maker's current inventory q grows positive (long), what happens to her optimal bid and ask quotes relative to the efficient price s, and why?

  1. Both bid and ask shift DOWN by the inventory skew qγσ^2(T-t), so she quotes more aggressively to sell and more passively to buy, encouraging mean-reversion of inventory toward zero
  2. Both her bid and ask quotes shift UP by qγσ^2(T-t), raising her effective offer so she captures extra spread on the side of the market she is already overexposed toward
  3. The half-spread widens symmetrically by qγσ^2(T-t) around an unchanged efficient price, pricing in the larger variance risk carried by her current long inventory position
  4. Only the ask quote shifts, moving down by qγσ^2(T-t), while the bid stays pinned exactly at s, since by assumption she will only ever trade to reduce, never add to, a long position

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →

More Market Microstructure practice

KomFi Academy — Stop doomscrolling. Get KomFi.

Build your intelligence, anytime, anywhere.

KomFi Academy is a curated training platform with 54,000+ practice questions, 20,000+ flashcards, on-demand video lectures, podcasts, and 4K slide decks across the topics serious professionals study: GMAT, LSAT, MCAT, Investment Banking, Private Equity (LBOs & PE math), Private Credit, Quantitative Finance, Financial Accounting, Asset- Backed Securities, Volume Profile Analysis, Order Flow Trading, Market Microstructure, Volume Spread Analysis, Elliott Wave Theory, Volume-Price Analysis, and Public Offering Frameworks.

What's inside

Topics

View pricing · Read testimonials