medium · Market Microstructure mmf-core
A continuous limit-order-book market and a periodic frequent-batch-auction (FBA) market are otherwise identical. A latency-arbitrage opportunity appears when a public signal moves the efficient price, leaving stale quotes.
Which statement best captures why the FBA changes the nature of the resulting competition among fast traders?
- The FBA converts the race to be first into a uniform-price auction, so liquidity-taking snipers compete on price rather than speed and the stale-quote rent is largely competed away.
- The FBA eliminates latency arbitrage entirely, because every order submitted within a given batch interval arrives and clears simultaneously, so no timing-based information asymmetry can exist.
- The FBA shifts the advantage decisively toward liquidity providers, because batching lets them cancel their stale quotes before any fast taker can act within the clearing interval.
- The FBA increases adverse selection borne by liquidity providers, because batching delays their ability to update stale quotes while fast takers still act continuously.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More Market Microstructure mmf-core practice
- A stock is trading at $100.00. The Level 1 S&P 500 Market-Wi… — What is the status of trad
- If the stock gaps down and opens at $69.50 on Tuesday morning, at what price will the trad
- Using the Lee-Ready algorithm, how should a trade occurring at $50.10 following a $50.00 t
- During the pre-open period of an opening auction, the exchan… — What is the primary purpos
- If a stock enters a 'limit state' and does not recover within 15 seconds, what is the regu
- A retail trader hears a stock tip on a popular social media… — How is this trader classifi
- A corn farmer is worried that prices will drop before the harvest in three months. The far
- What is the clearing price that maximizes volume?