medium · National Real Estate Exam disclosures

A seller's agent knows that a property was previously used as a meth lab, which is a material fact. The seller does not know. The agent fails to disclose it.

Under the doctrine of vicarious liability, can the seller be sued for fraud?

  1. Yes, because the agent's knowledge is imputed to the seller, so the seller's silence is legally considered an intentional concealment of a known defect.
  2. Yes, but only if the property was sold in a state that strictly follows the traditional common-law doctrine of caveat emptor between private parties.
  3. No, because fraud requires proof of 'intent,' and an uninformed seller cannot personally have formed any intent to deceive the buyer at the time of the sale.
  4. No, under these facts the buyer can only sue the seller for negligent misrepresentation rather than for intentional common-law fraud in most state jurisdictions.

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →

More National Real Estate Exam disclosures practice

KomFi: Test Prep Made Easy

KomFi: Test Prep Made Easy — free adaptive practice for GMAT, GRE, SAT, ACT, National Real Estate Exam, Investment Banking, and finance with full explanations.

KomFi Academy is free GMAT prep and personalized GMAT help built as a training platform: 92,240+ practice questions, 30,500+ flashcards, on-demand video lectures, podcasts, and 4K slide decks. Flagship tracks: Free GMAT Prep, Free GMAT Resources, National Real Estate Exam Prep, Investment Banking Prep, Finance Prep, GRE, SAT, ACT, LSAT, MCAT, Financial Accounting, Private Equity, Private Credit, and Quantitative Finance.

Free GMAT Prep & Personalized GMAT Help

What's inside

Topics

View pricing · Read testimonials