hard · National Real Estate Exam
A deed states the consideration as "$10 and other good and valuable consideration." In the same instrument the grantor warrants that the property is free of all encumbrances. After closing, the grantee discovers a recorded utility easement that predates the deed and was visible on the ground. The grantee sues on the covenant against encumbrances.
Which analysis is correct?
- The covenant against encumbrances is breached the moment the deed is delivered if the easement exists, regardless of the grantee's notice, though damages may be nominal if value is unaffected
- The covenant is not breached because a recorded, visible easement is excepted by operation of law from any general warranty
- The covenant is unenforceable because the recited '$10 and other valuable consideration' fails to state real consideration and voids the warranties
- The covenant runs with the land as a future covenant, so the claim does not accrue until the utility actually interferes with the grantee's use
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More National Real Estate Exam practice
- A broker's employment contract with a seller is officially called the:
- What is the current status of the contract?
- A buyer defaults on a purchase agreement, and the seller chooses to keep the earnest money
- A buyer makes a written offer to a seller. Two days later, before the seller has responded
- A contract for the sale of a property is signed. Before closing, the property is destroyed
- A contract for the sale of real estate that has been signed by both parties is valid, but
- A contract that is valid and binding but allows one party to avoid the agreement because o
- A contract that is valid and enforceable until it is canceled by a party who was a victim