medium · Order Flow Analysis absorption-exhaustion-imbalance
Which of the following describes the most disciplined response to 'Conflicting Signals' (e.g., you are short, but a stacked buying imbalance forms below you while your stop is still valid)?
- Ignore the buying imbalance because the primary daily trend is bearish and 'noise' is expected during pullbacks.
- Add to the short position to 'average up' the entry price since the original structural thesis (the selling zone) is still unviolated.
- Exit 50% or more of the position to lock in current profits and reduce exposure to the new opposing force.
- Move the stop-loss to the absolute high of the new buying imbalance bar to 'tighten' the risk.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More Order Flow Analysis absorption-exhaustion-imbalance practice
- What market phenomenon is occurring?
- Where is the most structurally sound place to put the stop loss for a short entry?
- A trader is analyzing a bar in the 10-Year Treasury (ZN). Th… — What does this suggest?
- During the first 30 minutes of the RTH session, the E-mini S… — If the price breaks above
- Where should the entry and stop be placed?
- The treatise mentions a 'Self-Reinforcing Feedback Loop' reg… — What does this mean for pr
- According to the structural stop-placement guide, where should the stop be placed if enter
- A market opens with a 10-point gap up. In the first 15 minutes, the footprint shows heavy