hard · Order Flow Analysis footprint-delta

Which interpretation of this positive-delta-yet-weak-close footprint is most defensible?

1. Aggressive selling concentrated at the low failed to push price down, so passive buyers were absorbing there; the net-positive delta is an artifact of top-of-range buying and the bar is location-dependent, not simply bullish
2. Net delta for the bar is positive, so buyers clearly dominated the entirety of the bar and the weak close near the session low is just noise; the bar is accumulation, poised to resolve upward on the very next print
3. Because the aggregate delta for the whole bar is positive, the 900 contracts traded at the bid near the low must reflect long liquidation rather than any resting passive bid that was genuinely being defended down on the ladder
4. The delta-versus-close divergence seen right at the session low here is textbook stopping volume, and stopping volume by strict definition mechanically guarantees a reversal higher within just a few of the subsequent trading bars

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →