hard · Order Flow Analysis
In the 10-Year Treasury Note (ZN) futures, you observe a stacked selling imbalance across three levels with an average of 600 contracts per level. In the E-mini S&P 500 (ES), you see a similar three-level stacked selling imbalance with 600 contracts per level.
How should your position sizing change?
- Avoid both trades as 600 contracts is insufficient to identify institutional activity in any major futures market.
- Prioritize the ES trade as $600 per level is a significant institutional signature for that market.
- Increase size in ZN because the higher liquidity makes the signal more reliable.
- Trade both with standard 1% risk as the contract volumes are identical.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More Order Flow Analysis practice
- An E-mini S&P 500 footprint bar shows a price level at $4510… — Using a 300% threshold, wh
- What market phenomenon is occurring?
- Where is the most structurally sound place to put the stop loss for a short entry?
- A trader is analyzing a bar in the 10-Year Treasury (ZN). Th… — What does this suggest?
- During the first 30 minutes of the RTH session, the E-mini S… — If the price breaks above
- Where should the entry and stop be placed?
- The treatise mentions a 'Self-Reinforcing Feedback Loop' reg… — What does this mean for pr
- What is the primary advantage of using the range-based chart in this scenario?