hard · Principles of Finance valuation

An analyst values a stable firm with a single APV pass: unlevered value of operations plus the present value of the interest tax shield, discounting the shield at the cost of debt r_d. The firm maintains a CONSTANT market-value debt-to-value RATIO (rebalancing debt each period to a fixed fraction of value), not a fixed dollar debt level.

Holding everything else constant, what is the most precise consequence of discounting the tax shield at r_d rather than at the unlevered cost of equity r_U?

  1. It overstates firm value, because under ratio rebalancing the shield inherits the business risk of operations after the first period and should be discounted at r_U.
  2. It correctly states firm value, since interest is contractual and the tax shield always carries debt-like risk regardless of the debt policy.
  3. It understates firm value, because ratio rebalancing makes the shield safer than debt and it should be discounted below r_d.
  4. It overstates firm value, because the shield should be discounted at the WACC, which exceeds r_d whenever the firm carries any equity.

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →

More Principles of Finance valuation practice

KomFi Academy — Stop doomscrolling. Get KomFi.

Build your intelligence, anytime, anywhere.

KomFi Academy is a curated training platform with 54,000+ practice questions, 20,000+ flashcards, on-demand video lectures, podcasts, and 4K slide decks across the topics serious professionals study: GMAT, LSAT, MCAT, Investment Banking, Private Equity (LBOs & PE math), Private Credit, Quantitative Finance, Financial Accounting, Asset- Backed Securities, Volume Profile Analysis, Order Flow Trading, Market Microstructure, Volume Spread Analysis, Elliott Wave Theory, Volume-Price Analysis, and Public Offering Frameworks.

What's inside

Topics

View pricing · Read testimonials