medium · Private Credit & Debt loan-structures-instruments

An investor is comparing two senior secured loans. Loan A is 'Sponsor-backed' at SOFR + 550 bps. Loan B is a 'Direct Lending' deal to an entrepreneur-owned firm at SOFR + 750 bps. Both have identical leverage.

What is the most plausible reason for the 200 bps 'Non-Sponsor Premium'?

  1. The absence of a sophisticated PE sponsor reduces the likelihood of an 'equity cure' during a covenant breach.
  2. Sponsor-backed loans are typically 'Second Lien,' whereas direct deals are always 'First Lien'.
  3. Direct lending deals have lower documentation standards, justifying a higher yield for legal risk.
  4. Entrepreneur-owned firms are required by the IRS to pay higher interest rates on external debt.

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →

More Private Credit & Debt loan-structures-instruments practice

KomFi Academy — Stop doomscrolling. Get KomFi.

Build your intelligence, anytime, anywhere.

KomFi Academy is a curated training platform with 46,000+ practice questions, 20,000+ flashcards, on-demand video lectures, podcasts, and 4K slide decks across the topics serious professionals study: GMAT, LSAT, MCAT, Investment Banking, Private Equity (LBOs & PE math), Private Credit, Quantitative Finance, Financial Accounting, Asset- Backed Securities, Volume Profile Analysis, Order Flow Trading, Market Microstructure, Volume Spread Analysis, Elliott Wave Theory, Volume-Price Analysis, and Public Offering Frameworks.

What's inside

Topics

View pricing · Read testimonials