hard · Quantitative Finance derivatives
A trader is long a one-year European at-the-money-forward straddle and delta-hedges continuously under Black-Scholes assumptions. Realized volatility turns out to equal the implied volatility used to price the straddle.
Ignoring funding and transaction costs, which statement about the trader's P&L is correct?
- The total hedged P&L is exactly zero in expectation but has positive variance, since gamma P&L is path-dependent even when realized equals implied volatility
- The hedged P&L is exactly zero along every path, because the daily gamma-theta balance holds pointwise when realized volatility equals implied volatility
- The hedged P&L equals the integral of one-half gamma times the gap between squared realized and implied volatility, which is zero only in expectation, not pathwise
- The hedged P&L is positive because the long-gamma position always profits from the convexity of the option payoff regardless of the volatility match
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More Quantitative Finance derivatives practice
- If the underlying stock price S moves by +$2.00 over a very short interval, what is the es
- If the risk-neutral probability of an up move is p = 0.6 and the risk-free rate is zero, w
- When pricing a 'Digital' (or Binary) call option near expiry with the spot price very clos
- In the context of the Black-Scholes PDE, the Greek 'Theta' (Theta) measures the sensitivit
- When calibrating a Heston stochastic volatility model, a pra… — Does this calibration sati
- Based on put-call parity, what is the arbitrage-free relationship?
- Given a continuously compounded risk-free rate of 5%, what is the price of the correspondi
- If the risk-free growth factor is e^rT = 1.02, what is the risk-neutral probability p^* of