hard · Quantitative Finance derivatives

A trader is long a one-year European at-the-money-forward straddle and delta-hedges continuously under Black-Scholes assumptions. Realized volatility turns out to equal the implied volatility used to price the straddle.

Ignoring funding and transaction costs, which statement about the trader's P&L is correct?

  1. The total hedged P&L is exactly zero in expectation but has positive variance, since gamma P&L is path-dependent even when realized equals implied volatility
  2. The hedged P&L is exactly zero along every path, because the daily gamma-theta balance holds pointwise when realized volatility equals implied volatility
  3. The hedged P&L equals the integral of one-half gamma times the gap between squared realized and implied volatility, which is zero only in expectation, not pathwise
  4. The hedged P&L is positive because the long-gamma position always profits from the convexity of the option payoff regardless of the volatility match

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →

More Quantitative Finance derivatives practice

KomFi: Test Prep Made Easy

KomFi: Test Prep Made Easy — free adaptive practice for GMAT, GRE, SAT, ACT, National Real Estate Exam, Investment Banking, and finance with full explanations.

KomFi Academy is free GMAT prep and personalized GMAT help built as a training platform: 92,240+ practice questions, 30,500+ flashcards, on-demand video lectures, podcasts, and 4K slide decks. Flagship tracks: Free GMAT Prep, Free GMAT Resources, National Real Estate Exam Prep, Investment Banking Prep, Finance Prep, GRE, SAT, ACT, LSAT, MCAT, Financial Accounting, Private Equity, Private Credit, and Quantitative Finance.

Free GMAT Prep & Personalized GMAT Help

What's inside

Topics

View pricing · Read testimonials