hard · Quantitative Finance

A trader is long a one-year European at-the-money-forward straddle and delta-hedges continuously under Black-Scholes assumptions. Realized volatility turns out to equal the implied volatility used to price the straddle.

Ignoring funding and transaction costs, which statement about the trader's P&L is correct?

  1. The total hedged P&L is exactly zero in expectation but has positive variance, since gamma P&L is path-dependent even when realized equals implied volatility
  2. The hedged P&L is exactly zero along every path, because the daily gamma-theta balance holds pointwise when realized volatility equals implied volatility
  3. The hedged P&L equals the integral of one-half gamma times the gap between squared realized and implied volatility, which is zero only in expectation, not pathwise
  4. The hedged P&L is positive because the long-gamma position always profits from the convexity of the option payoff regardless of the volatility match

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →

More Quantitative Finance practice

KomFi Academy — Stop doomscrolling. Get KomFi.

Build your intelligence, anytime, anywhere.

KomFi Academy is a curated training platform with 54,000+ practice questions, 20,000+ flashcards, on-demand video lectures, podcasts, and 4K slide decks across the topics serious professionals study: GMAT, LSAT, MCAT, Investment Banking, Private Equity (LBOs & PE math), Private Credit, Quantitative Finance, Financial Accounting, Asset- Backed Securities, Volume Profile Analysis, Order Flow Trading, Market Microstructure, Volume Spread Analysis, Elliott Wave Theory, Volume-Price Analysis, and Public Offering Frameworks.

What's inside

Topics

View pricing · Read testimonials