hard · Quantitative Finance
A trader is long a one-year European at-the-money-forward straddle and delta-hedges continuously under Black-Scholes assumptions. Realized volatility turns out to equal the implied volatility used to price the straddle.
Ignoring funding and transaction costs, which statement about the trader's P&L is correct?
- The total hedged P&L is exactly zero in expectation but has positive variance, since gamma P&L is path-dependent even when realized equals implied volatility
- The hedged P&L is exactly zero along every path, because the daily gamma-theta balance holds pointwise when realized volatility equals implied volatility
- The hedged P&L equals the integral of one-half gamma times the gap between squared realized and implied volatility, which is zero only in expectation, not pathwise
- The hedged P&L is positive because the long-gamma position always profits from the convexity of the option payoff regardless of the volatility match
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More Quantitative Finance practice
- If the underlying stock price S moves by +$2.00 over a very short interval, what is the es
- What is the estimated OLS slope hatβ?
- If the flat yield curve is at 4% (continuously compounded), what is the bond's price?
- As the number of assets n approaches infinity, what happens to the total portfolio varianc
- What is the fair no-arbitrage price for a six-month (T = 0.5) forward contract?
- If the risk-neutral probability of an up move is p = 0.6 and the risk-free rate is zero, w
- When pricing a 'Digital' (or Binary) call option near expiry with the spot price very clos
- Calculate the price of a zero-coupon bond that pays $1000 in two years, given that the one