medium · SAT Reading & Writing

Text 1: Epidemiologists use 'herd immunity' thresholds to determine what percentage of a population must be vaccinated to stop the spread of a disease. For highly contagious viruses like measles, the threshold is estimated at 95%, meaning that below this level, outbreaks are essentially inevitable. Text 2: The 95% threshold assumes a 'homogeneously mixing' population, where everyone has an equal chance of meeting everyone else. In reality, populations are clustered. If vaccination rates are 98% in most areas but only 70% in a few tight-knit communities, outbreaks can still occur even if the national average is well above the threshold.

Based on the texts, how would the author of Text 2 most likely respond to the 'threshold' described in Text 1?

  1. By arguing that a single national average may fail to account for local variations in vaccination coverage.
  2. By noting that the first successful vaccine was developed for smallpox in the late eighteenth century.
  3. By claiming that vaccines have little real effect on outbreaks and that thresholds should be abandoned.
  4. By insisting that 100% of the population must be vaccinated everywhere before any outbreak can be prevented.

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →

More SAT Reading & Writing practice

KomFi Academy — Stop doomscrolling. Get KomFi.

Turn wasted screen time into verifiable competence.

KomFi Academy is a curated training platform with 66,000+ practice questions, 25,000+ flashcards, on-demand video lectures, podcasts, and 4K slide decks across the topics serious professionals study: GMAT, LSAT, MCAT, SAT, Investment Banking, Private Equity (LBOs & PE math), Private Credit, Quantitative Finance, Financial Accounting, Asset- Backed Securities, Volume Profile Analysis, Order Flow Trading, Market Microstructure, Volume Spread Analysis, Elliott Wave Theory, Volume-Price Analysis, and Public Offering Frameworks.

What's inside

Topics

View pricing · Read testimonials