medium · SAT Reading & Writing

Economist Kenji Sato suggests that the 'productivity paradox'—the idea that increased investment in technology does not always yield a corresponding rise in output—is often a matter of timing. Sato argues that firms frequently experience a 'learning dip' immediately after adopting new systems, as workers spend more time troubleshooting and adapting than performing their primary tasks. He concludes that the benefits of technology are real but often delayed by these transitional friction points.

Which choice best states the main idea of the text?

  1. Sato argues that technological investment is generally a waste of resources because it consistently leads to a decrease in overall productivity.
  2. The productivity paradox can be explained by the temporary loss of efficiency that occurs while workers learn to use new technological systems.
  3. Investment in technology leads to an immediate and significant increase in a firm's output once the initial learning dip is overcome.
  4. Workers at most firms are unable to adapt to new technologies, which is the primary reason that output remains stagnant over time.

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →

More SAT Reading & Writing practice

KomFi Academy — Stop doomscrolling. Get KomFi.

Turn wasted screen time into verifiable competence.

KomFi Academy is a curated training platform with 66,000+ practice questions, 25,000+ flashcards, on-demand video lectures, podcasts, and 4K slide decks across the topics serious professionals study: GMAT, LSAT, MCAT, SAT, Investment Banking, Private Equity (LBOs & PE math), Private Credit, Quantitative Finance, Financial Accounting, Asset- Backed Securities, Volume Profile Analysis, Order Flow Trading, Market Microstructure, Volume Spread Analysis, Elliott Wave Theory, Volume-Price Analysis, and Public Offering Frameworks.

What's inside

Topics

View pricing · Read testimonials