medium · SAT Reading & Writing

In a study of the 'bystander effect,' psychologist Dr. Samuel Reed hypothesized that individuals are more likely to intervene in an emergency if they perceive themselves as having a unique skill relevant to the situation, even when many other people are present.

Which finding, if true, would most directly support Reed's hypothesis?

  1. The likelihood of a bystander helping decreased as the total number of people witnessing the emergency increased, regardless of the bystanders' backgrounds.
  2. Participants in the study reported feeling significantly more anxious and distressed when they witnessed an emergency in a crowded public space.
  3. Most people who have intervened in real-world emergencies stated that they acted purely on instinct without thinking about the risks involved.
  4. In a simulated medical emergency, bystanders who had recently completed a first-aid course were twice as likely to help as those who had no medical training.

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →

More SAT Reading & Writing practice

KomFi Academy — Stop doomscrolling. Get KomFi.

Turn wasted screen time into verifiable competence.

KomFi Academy is a curated training platform with 66,000+ practice questions, 25,000+ flashcards, on-demand video lectures, podcasts, and 4K slide decks across the topics serious professionals study: GMAT, LSAT, MCAT, SAT, Investment Banking, Private Equity (LBOs & PE math), Private Credit, Quantitative Finance, Financial Accounting, Asset- Backed Securities, Volume Profile Analysis, Order Flow Trading, Market Microstructure, Volume Spread Analysis, Elliott Wave Theory, Volume-Price Analysis, and Public Offering Frameworks.

What's inside

Topics

View pricing · Read testimonials