hard · Volume Profile Analysis profile-anatomy
In a normal-distribution day, the value area is conventionally defined as the price range containing ~70% of the session's volume (or TPOs), built outward from the POC. A junior analyst computes value-area high/low by taking the POC and extending exactly one standard deviation in each direction.
On a session with pronounced positive skew (a long thin upper tail), why will this 1-SD shortcut systematically misplace the value area versus the standard TPO/volume method?
- It won't — one standard deviation around the mean captures 68% which rounds to the 70% rule, so the two methods are interchangeable on any session
- The 1-SD method centers and sizes value on the MEAN and assumes symmetry, so a positive skew pulls its band upward and widens it, whereas the 70% method grows asymmetrically OUTWARD FROM THE POC (the mode) and will hug the dense lower node, placing VAH/VAL lower and tighter on top
- The skew has no effect because standard deviation is itself skew-invariant, so both methods will return the same VAH and VAL to the tick
- The 70% method also keys off the mean, so any discrepancy must come from the analyst using TPO counts instead of volume, not from the skew
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More Volume Profile Analysis profile-anatomy practice
- If today's Value Area High (VAH) is $1.0820 and tomorrow's Value Area Low (VAL) is establi
- A session on AUD/USD has a Value Area of $0.6650 to $0.6680. The following session's Value
- On USD/JPY, Session 1 Value Area is $151.20 to 151.80. Session 2 Value Area is $151.30 to
- Comparing two sessions on Brent Crude: Day 1 VAH is $82.50, VAL is 81.20. Day 2 VAH is $81
- Monday's Value Area is $20450 to $20550. Tuesday's Value Area is $20560 to $20660. Tuesday
- You observe a GBP/USD session where the Value Area High (VAH… — What does this 'Value Migr
- Price probes below the prior day's VAL at $1.0820 on EUR/USD. It immediately snaps back in
- What is the standard iterative step?