hard · Volume Profile Analysis profile-anatomy

In a normal-distribution day, the value area is conventionally defined as the price range containing ~70% of the session's volume (or TPOs), built outward from the POC. A junior analyst computes value-area high/low by taking the POC and extending exactly one standard deviation in each direction.

On a session with pronounced positive skew (a long thin upper tail), why will this 1-SD shortcut systematically misplace the value area versus the standard TPO/volume method?

  1. It won't — one standard deviation around the mean captures 68% which rounds to the 70% rule, so the two methods are interchangeable on any session
  2. The 1-SD method centers and sizes value on the MEAN and assumes symmetry, so a positive skew pulls its band upward and widens it, whereas the 70% method grows asymmetrically OUTWARD FROM THE POC (the mode) and will hug the dense lower node, placing VAH/VAL lower and tighter on top
  3. The skew has no effect because standard deviation is itself skew-invariant, so both methods will return the same VAH and VAL to the tick
  4. The 70% method also keys off the mean, so any discrepancy must come from the analyst using TPO counts instead of volume, not from the skew

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →

More Volume Profile Analysis profile-anatomy practice

KomFi Academy — Stop doomscrolling. Get KomFi.

Build your intelligence, anytime, anywhere.

KomFi Academy is a curated training platform with 54,000+ practice questions, 20,000+ flashcards, on-demand video lectures, podcasts, and 4K slide decks across the topics serious professionals study: GMAT, LSAT, MCAT, Investment Banking, Private Equity (LBOs & PE math), Private Credit, Quantitative Finance, Financial Accounting, Asset- Backed Securities, Volume Profile Analysis, Order Flow Trading, Market Microstructure, Volume Spread Analysis, Elliott Wave Theory, Volume-Price Analysis, and Public Offering Frameworks.

What's inside

Topics

View pricing · Read testimonials