medium · Volume Profile Analysis reference-levels-migration
A trader builds a 3-session composite profile for AUD/USD. Session 1 had a POC at 0.6540, Session 2 had a POC at 0.6555, and Session 3 had a POC at 0.6570. The composite POC lands at 0.6552.
How should the trader interpret the difference between the composite POC and the most recent single-session POC?
- The composite POC must simply be wrong because it prints lower than the most recent single session's POC; the correct operating rule in every case is to discard the composite reading entirely and trust only the latest session's POC
- The gap between 0.6552 and 0.6570 is a guaranteed mechanical fill level, so price is absolutely certain to retrace all the way back down to precisely 0.6552 first before it can ever manage to resume moving any higher again from there
- The composite POC is always exactly the arithmetic average of the three individual single-session POCs, so the 0.6552 figure here must therefore simply be the plain unweighted mean of 0.6540, 0.6555, and 0.6570 taken together as one single number
- The composite POC at 0.6552 represents the average volume-weighted fair value across all three sessions, while the session-3 POC at 0.6570 shows where the most recent auction found acceptance; together they confirm an upward value migration
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More Volume Profile Analysis reference-levels-migration practice
- What is the most likely behavior as price approaches $1.2710?
- How should the nPOC influence the trade plan?
- Which assessment best applies volume profile logic?
- Which interpretation is most consistent with auction theory?
- What is the most structurally coherent volume profile interpretation of this situation?
- What is the volume profile interpretation?
- A volume profile analyst reviews 20 sessions of data for an… — What auction-market conditi
- During a London session for EUR futures, a 30-minute bar rea… — How does the volume profil