medium · Volume Profile Analysis trading-strategies
Session A for ES built a D-shaped profile with the POC at 5,440. Session B also built a D-shape, but the POC migrated to 5,465. The composite POC for both sessions combined is at 5,450. On Session C's open, price is at 5,462.
Which profile reference is MOST relevant for a mean-reversion fade back to value?
- Session A's POC at 5,440, because it is the oldest established mean in the window and therefore anchors the entire two-session balance and remains the primary value reference.
- The composite POC at 5,450, because it represents the volume-weighted center of the two-session period and is the most meaningful mean when price is between the two individual session POCs.
- Session B's POC at 5,465, because the most recent session's POC always dominates and structurally supersedes every older value reference in the period, including any aggregated composite mean.
- The geometric midpoint between 5,440 and 5,465 (5,452.50), taken as the true structural center of the two-session move regardless of how the underlying traded volume itself happens to be distributed.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More Volume Profile Analysis trading-strategies practice
- Where is the most logical place for your protective stop-loss?
- Based on the concept of 'naked POC decay' and magnetic pull, what is the most disciplined
- What is the most defensible stop-loss placement for a short entry based on this rejection?
- How should a trader manage counter-trend resistance levels in this environment?
- If the first target is an HVN at $1.37500, what is the Reward-to-Risk (R:R) ratio of this
- A trader identifies a rejection setup on EUR/USD. Price touc… — How should this trade be s
- A price probe at $1.3615 is followed by a sharp retreat, lea… — How should this 'Failed Au
- What structural landmark now serves as the day's primary protective stop for a short trade