hard · Volume Spread Analysis effort-vs-result-spread

Two up-bars both close on their highs with identical wide spreads. Up-bar X occurs on the first push out of a long accumulation base; up-bar Y occurs after an extended markup, several bars into new high ground. Up-bar X prints high volume; up-bar Y prints even higher, climactic volume.

Applying effort-vs-result reasoning to CONTEXT rather than the bar in isolation, why can the same 'wide spread, high close, big volume' footprint be bullish on X but a warning on Y?

  1. On X the high volume is demand overcoming light supply, while on Y the climactic volume into new highs likely marks supply entering against exhausted demand.
  2. On Y the higher volume is simply stronger confirmation, so Y is more bullish than X and the footprint carries the same meaning in both locations.
  3. The footprints differ only because Y's spread, though equal in points, is a smaller percentage move at higher price, weakening the result.
  4. On X the wide spread proves professional support, whereas on Y the identical spread proves the same support has merely grown stronger with price.

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →

More Volume Spread Analysis effort-vs-result-spread practice

KomFi Academy — Stop doomscrolling. Get KomFi.

Build your intelligence, anytime, anywhere.

KomFi Academy is a curated training platform with 54,000+ practice questions, 20,000+ flashcards, on-demand video lectures, podcasts, and 4K slide decks across the topics serious professionals study: GMAT, LSAT, MCAT, Investment Banking, Private Equity (LBOs & PE math), Private Credit, Quantitative Finance, Financial Accounting, Asset- Backed Securities, Volume Profile Analysis, Order Flow Trading, Market Microstructure, Volume Spread Analysis, Elliott Wave Theory, Volume-Price Analysis, and Public Offering Frameworks.

What's inside

Topics

View pricing · Read testimonials