easy · Debt Capital Markets credit-ratings-risk
Why do lenders use 'EBITDA' instead of 'Net Income' for leverage and coverage covenants?
- It provides a better proxy for the cash flow available to service debt by stripping out non-cash charges and tax effects.
- No statute requires this; selecting a covenant metric is purely a commercial drafting choice between the parties.
- It is a strictly GAAP-defined number that external auditors are required to certify, so management cannot adjust the figure.
- It will always exceed the firm's actual operating cash flow, so the leverage ratio it produces understates the true credit risk.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More Debt Capital Markets credit-ratings-risk practice
- In the context of Debt Capital Markets, what is a leverage-based margin ratchet?
- Why is the Administrative Agent's role important for the margin ratchet?
- What happens to the credit spread of a 'fallen angel' issuer?
- In Debt Capital Markets, who is generally the 'payer' of the credit spread in a standard b
- In a cov-lite loan, which event would most likely trigger a financial ratio test?
- In the context of credit covenants, what is the primary difference between a maintenance c
- In a Credit Default Swap (CDS), what is the primary obligation of the protection seller?
- Which of the following is NOT typically a 'Restricted Payment'?