medium · Debt Capital Markets credit-ratings-risk
Why might a borrower prefer incurrence covenants over maintenance covenants?
- They always result in a measurably lower fixed interest rate on the borrowed debt amount.
- They offer greater operational flexibility and do not risk default simply from a business downturn.
- They eliminate the need for any negotiated EBITDA definition within the credit agreement entirely.
- They are considerably easier for the major credit rating agencies to model, score, and analyze in practice.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More Debt Capital Markets credit-ratings-risk practice
- In the context of Debt Capital Markets, what is a leverage-based margin ratchet?
- Why is the Administrative Agent's role important for the margin ratchet?
- What happens to the credit spread of a 'fallen angel' issuer?
- In Debt Capital Markets, who is generally the 'payer' of the credit spread in a standard b
- In a cov-lite loan, which event would most likely trigger a financial ratio test?
- In the context of credit covenants, what is the primary difference between a maintenance c
- In a Credit Default Swap (CDS), what is the primary obligation of the protection seller?
- Which of the following is NOT typically a 'Restricted Payment'?