hard · Elliott Wave Theory corrective
A zigzag (5-3-5) has wave A = 50 points and a sharp wave B retracing 50% of A. A trader argues wave C 'must' equal A (the most common relationship).
If instead wave C extends to 1.618×A, where does C terminate relative to the START of the zigzag, and which secondary check best validates that C is a complete five rather than an extension still in progress?
- C ends 30.9 points beyond the zigzag's start; validate completion by confirming wave 5 of C shows momentum divergence and the channel's lower line is reached after a clean 5-wave subdivision
- C ends 80.9 points beyond the zigzag's start; validate by checking that wave 3 of C is the shortest of its five sub-waves, since properly extended C waves always shorten their third leg substantially
- C ends exactly at the zigzag's start, net zero, which validates completion because a 1.618 extension of wave C is claimed to always fully retrace the entire prior advance back to origin
- C ends 50 points beyond the zigzag's start; validate by confirming that C equals A in exact price length, since that strict equality is the defining requirement present in every valid zigzag correction
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More Elliott Wave Theory corrective practice
- An analyst sees a coiling sideways pattern with five legs (A… — What mistake has been made
- Scenario: Wave A of a correction has $5 clear sub-waves. What can the analyst immediately
- If a correction consists of five overlapping legs (A, B, C, D, E), where every single leg
- In a powerful uptrend, a correction occurs where wave B exceeds the start of wave A, but w
- Which corrective pattern is known for being a 'sharp' correction and is most commonly foun
- During an expanding triangle, which of the following is true regarding the size of the wav
- A correction in a bear market rallies in 3 waves to a level… — Which pattern does this rep
- An analyst sees a 3-wave decline followed by a 3-wave rally that retraces 95% of the decli