medium · Elliott Wave Theory motive
An impulse is alleged in which wave 1 and wave 5 are nearly equal in length and wave 3 is clearly the longest.
Applying the guideline of alternation together with the rules, which single observation would MOST decisively falsify the impulse label (as opposed to merely being atypical)?
- Wave 4 ending below the terminal price of wave 1, producing genuine overlap of the two waves' price territories.
- Wave 2 retracing 78.6% of wave 1, which is a deep but rule-permissible retracement.
- Wave 2 and wave 4 sharing the same corrective form (e.g., both sharp zigzags), violating only the guideline of alternation.
- Wave 5 failing to make a new high beyond wave 3 (a truncated fifth), which remains a valid impulse variant.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More Elliott Wave Theory motive practice
- In a five-wave advance, Wave 1 is 10 points long, Wave 3 is… — How should this count be co
- If Rule 3 must be satisfied, what is the highest price Wave 4 can reach?
- An analyst identifies a 5-wave pattern where Wave 4 overlaps… — Where is this pattern most
- When analyzing an Ending Diagonal, what is the 'Slope Comparison' requirement for confirmi
- If Wave 3 reaches $160.00, which of the following price levels would invalidate the impuls
- You observe a five-wave motive move in a wedge shape where W… — Where in the larger trend
- What is the 'Orthodox Extreme' in a five-wave impulse that ends with a truncated fifth wav
- If the next correction drops the price to $118 before a final rally to $180, why is this c