medium · Elliott Wave Theory motive
Consider an impulse where wave 3 is the extended wave. The 'rule of equality' (a guideline) and the extension principle together suggest which expectation for the two non-extended actionary waves (1 and 5)?
- Waves 1 and 5 tend toward equality with each other in length or time, often relating by a Fibonacci ratio, while wave 3 stands apart as the extended (longest) wave.
- Waves 1 and 5 must be exactly equal in length and duration, since the rule of equality becomes an inviolable rule the moment wave 3 extends beyond the others.
- Waves 1 and 5 should each equal wave 3 in length, because the two non-extended actionary waves are expected to mirror the extended wave itself under the equality principle.
- Wave 5 should equal 1.618 times the length of wave 3, because the extended wave fixes the Fibonacci projection target used for measuring the final actionary wave in the sequence.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More Elliott Wave Theory motive practice
- In a five-wave advance, Wave 1 is 10 points long, Wave 3 is… — How should this count be co
- If Rule 3 must be satisfied, what is the highest price Wave 4 can reach?
- An analyst identifies a 5-wave pattern where Wave 4 overlaps… — Where is this pattern most
- When analyzing an Ending Diagonal, what is the 'Slope Comparison' requirement for confirmi
- If Wave 3 reaches $160.00, which of the following price levels would invalidate the impuls
- You observe a five-wave motive move in a wedge shape where W… — Where in the larger trend
- What is the 'Orthodox Extreme' in a five-wave impulse that ends with a truncated fifth wav
- If the next correction drops the price to $118 before a final rally to $180, why is this c