medium · Elliott Wave Theory motive

An analyst labels a five-wave advance as an impulse where wave 1 is extended, wave 3 is the longest visually, and wave 5 is short.

To confirm this is an impulse and not an ending diagonal, which observation is the decisive discriminator?

  1. Wave 3 being visibly the longest of the five waves by itself proves an impulse count, since diagonals never allow wave 3 to be the longest leg present
  2. The action waves (1, 3, 5) subdivide as five-wave motive structures and wave 4 does not overlap wave 1, neither of which a contracting ending diagonal satisfies
  3. Wave 5 being noticeably short is typical of many textbook impulses, though a short final wave never by itself rules out a converging ending diagonal count
  4. Wave 2 retraces more than 61.8% of wave 1, a depth that only impulses permit, since ending diagonals strictly forbid such a deep, sharp second-wave retracement pullback

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →

More Elliott Wave Theory motive practice

KomFi: Test Prep Made Easy

KomFi: Test Prep Made Easy — free adaptive practice for GMAT, GRE, SAT, ACT, National Real Estate Exam, Investment Banking, and finance with full explanations.

KomFi Academy is free GMAT prep and personalized GMAT help built as a training platform: 92,240+ practice questions, 30,500+ flashcards, on-demand video lectures, podcasts, and 4K slide decks. Flagship tracks: Free GMAT Prep, Free GMAT Resources, National Real Estate Exam Prep, Investment Banking Prep, Finance Prep, GRE, SAT, ACT, LSAT, MCAT, Financial Accounting, Private Equity, Private Credit, and Quantitative Finance.

Free GMAT Prep & Personalized GMAT Help

What's inside

Topics

View pricing · Read testimonials