medium · Elliott Wave Theory motive

An analyst labels a five-wave advance as an impulse where wave 1 is extended, wave 3 is the longest visually, and wave 5 is short.

To confirm this is an impulse and not an ending diagonal, which observation is the decisive discriminator?

  1. Wave 3 being visibly the longest of the five waves by itself proves an impulse count, since diagonals never allow wave 3 to be the longest leg present
  2. The action waves (1, 3, 5) subdivide as five-wave motive structures and wave 4 does not overlap wave 1, neither of which a contracting ending diagonal satisfies
  3. Wave 5 being noticeably short is typical of many textbook impulses, though a short final wave never by itself rules out a converging ending diagonal count
  4. Wave 2 retraces more than 61.8% of wave 1, a depth that only impulses permit, since ending diagonals strictly forbid such a deep, sharp second-wave retracement pullback

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →

More Elliott Wave Theory motive practice

KomFi Academy — Stop doomscrolling. Get KomFi.

Turn wasted screen time into verifiable competence.

KomFi Academy is a curated training platform with 75,000+ practice questions, 26,500+ flashcards, on-demand video lectures, podcasts, and 4K slide decks across the topics serious professionals study: GMAT, LSAT, MCAT, SAT, Investment Banking, Private Equity (LBOs & PE math), Private Credit, Quantitative Finance, Financial Accounting, Asset- Backed Securities, Volume Profile Analysis, Order Flow Trading, Market Microstructure, Volume Spread Analysis, Elliott Wave Theory, Volume-Price Analysis, and Public Offering Frameworks.

What's inside

Topics

View pricing · Read testimonials