medium · FRM Part 1 Financial Markets and Products
A commodity trades in contango with a stable, positive convenience yield. An analyst claims that for a storable commodity, the futures price must always exceed the spot price whenever storage costs are positive.
Under the cost-of-carry framework with continuous compounding, which statement is correct?
- The claim is false; the futures price equals S_0 e^(r+u-y)T, so if the convenience yield y exceeds the sum of the risk-free rate r and storage cost u, the market is in backwardation despite positive storage costs
- The claim is true; positive storage costs u are simply added directly into the cost of carry, so F_0=S_0 e^(r+u)T>S_0 must always hold for any storable commodity regardless of the convenience yield's size
- The claim is false, but only because storage costs mechanically reduce the futures price, so F_0=S_0 e^(r-u)T can fall well below spot whenever storage is sufficiently expensive relative to the prevailing risk-free rate
- The claim is true in expectation under the risk-neutral pricing measure, since the convenience yield simply behaves like a dividend-type benefit that raises, rather than lowers, the effective cost of carry on the position being held
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More FRM Part 1 Financial Markets and Products practice
- If at the time of delivery S_1 = $72 and F_1 = $74, while the hedge was entered at F_0 =
- If the oil market shifts from backwardation to a persistent contango, which of the followi
- A 'long' position in which of the following provides insurance against a rise in prices?
- Immediately following a reset date (and the subsequent payment), what is the value of the
- In a clearinghouse structure, multilateral netting allows for:
- In the context of derivative markets, what does the term 'counterparty credit risk' specif
- If at maturity the futures price were significantly higher than the spot price, what would
- A 'Fallen Angel' is a term used in the bond market to describe: