hard · FRM Part 1 Financial Markets and Products
A commodity trades in contango with a stable, positive convenience yield. An analyst claims that for a storable commodity, the futures price must always exceed the spot price whenever storage costs are positive.
Under the cost-of-carry framework with continuous compounding, which statement is correct?
- The claim is false; the futures price equals S_0 e^(r+u-y)T, so if the convenience yield y exceeds the sum of the risk-free rate r and storage cost u, the market is in backwardation despite positive storage costs
- The claim is true; positive storage costs u are added to the carry, so F_0=S_0 e^(r+u)T>S_0 always holds for storable commodities regardless of any convenience yield
- The claim is false, but only because storage costs reduce the futures price, so F_0=S_0 e^(r-u)T can fall below spot when storage is expensive
- The claim is true in expectation under the risk-neutral measure, since the convenience yield is a dividend-like benefit that raises rather than lowers the cost of carry
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More FRM Part 1 Financial Markets and Products practice
- If the oil market shifts from backwardation to a persistent contango, which of the followi
- If at the time of delivery S_1 = $72 and F_1 = $74, while the hedge was entered at F_0 =
- According to the standard 'Default Waterfall' of a Central Counterparty (CCP), which layer
- A 'Fallen Angel' is a term used in the bond market to describe:
- A 'long' position in which of the following provides insurance against a rise in prices?
- An American put option is deep in the money. Why might it be optimal to exercise this opti
- If at maturity the futures price were significantly higher than the spot price, what would
- How is the 'swap rate' typically determined at the inception of an interest-rate swap?